You are not logged in.

#1 2017-11-04 18:59:33

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 823
Website

community/libreoffice-online

libreoffice-fresh and libreoffice-still are in conflict. Remove libreoffice-still? [y/N] error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)

:: libreoffice-fresh and libreoffice-still are in conflict
==> ERROR: 'pacman' failed to install missing dependencies.

Indeed I see:

(138/139) installing libreoffice-still                          [##################################] 100%

above.

In PKGBUILD I see:

makedepends=("cppunit" "poco" "libreoffice-fresh-sdk>=5.4" "jake" "npm" "chrpath" "python-polib")
depends=("libpng12" "poco" "pcre" "cpio" "libreoffice" "openssl-1.0")

So the question is, why is libreoffice in depends resolved to libreoffice-still?

And should we allow the build-package script to solve such conflicts automatically?

Offline

#2 2017-11-05 14:46:47

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 608

Re: community/libreoffice-online

depends is resolved before makedepends and if libreoffice-still is in testing while libreoffice-fresh is in stable, then "libreoffice" will be resolved by libreoffice-still, creating an issue.
I have seen this many times with java before (java-environment>=8 in depends and java-environment=8 in makedepends plus cannot-build-with-java8 results in errors). Just change the depends to a specific libreoffice or wait until libreoffice-still is stabilized.

Offline

#3 2017-11-05 23:02:31

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 608

Re: community/libreoffice-online

see also FS#32723

Offline

#4 2017-11-06 20:00:58

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 608

Re: community/libreoffice-online

ok, with the patch attached to the pacman-bug, the package compiles :-)
ah, ok, this might be due to libreoffice-still now being in extra, so not sure if the patch really works as intended

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB