You are not logged in.

#1 2017-11-07 09:43:54

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

bugtracker now online

Hi,
a big thanks goes to tyzoid for setting up a bugtracker!
So please, from now on, report bugs of packages there. Nevertheless, this forum should (still) be used for discussion(s) on packages.

Also note, that the build-master checks the bug list on the bug tracker for some actions.
Most notably, package-x won't be moved from testing to stable if there is an unresolved bug in category "Packages: Testing" with "[package-x]" in the title.

cheers,
deep42thought

Offline

#2 2017-11-07 09:53:49

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Registered, I don't seem to have the right though to add a new bug. :-)

Offline

#3 2017-11-07 09:58:35

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

You're now a "reporter" - does that help?

ah, ok. The email notification does not work yet, so tyzoid enabled manual registration (e.g. an admin needs to approve your registration).

Offline

#4 2017-11-07 09:59:23

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Yes. This helps. I can add a bug now.

Offline

#5 2017-11-07 10:00:39

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Question: the package names has to appear in the summary of the bug? As on Archlinux [ffmpeg] or should we invent a convention here?

Offline

#6 2017-11-07 10:02:58

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

The package name needs to be in the title and encapsulated in square brackets. That's right. I thought, this was the convention upstream, too?

Offline

#7 2017-11-07 10:04:09

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

as an example: FS#2

Offline

#8 2017-11-07 10:05:32

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Ok. Perfect.

Offline

#9 2017-11-07 10:07:10

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

I hope there will not be a confusion here: in the list of blocked packages we use FS#xxxx to reference bugs upstreams.
Now we get colliding flyspray number for our own bugreporting tool.
Should we have a FS#4444 and FS32#4444 for the blocking emails?

Offline

#10 2017-11-07 10:14:52

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

that's exactly, what I told the build-master scripts :-)
It recognizes FS32#$number

Offline

#11 2017-11-07 10:17:15

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Ah. Cool. :-)

Offline

#12 2017-11-07 10:17:35

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

I'm filling in some already known bugs..

Offline

#13 2017-11-07 10:18:01

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

ok, thanks - but use the subcategories, please

Offline

#14 2017-11-07 10:22:09

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Oups, maybe I need more rights, I cannot change them now..

Offline

#15 2017-11-07 10:26:48

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Thanks. :-)

Offline

#16 2017-11-07 10:27:14

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

Maybe, there are too many different user groups anyway (who needs "basic"?)

Offline

#17 2017-11-09 08:37:37

andreas_baumann
Administrator
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2017-08-10
Posts: 601
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Some questions:
- Should we theme the bug tracker in the Archlinux way? Is there an easy way to do it?
- What happens with i686 bugs over on http://bugs.archlinux.org? Will they be simply deleted?
  Or can they be exported from that instance and be reimported into our bug tracking? Would
  be a shame to loose known bugs concering 32-bit issues..

Offline

#18 2017-11-09 21:27:17

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

Offline

#19 2018-01-10 22:02:48

jonathon
Member
From: UK
Registered: 2017-07-19
Posts: 32
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

deep42thought wrote:

You're now a "reporter" - does that help?

ah, ok. The email notification does not work yet, so tyzoid enabled manual registration (e.g. an admin needs to approve your registration).

Do new accounts still need both email and admin activation?

Offline

#20 2018-01-11 05:36:48

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

I'm not sure about that. As I read it, you can register w/o admin interaction, but we still need to promote you to "reporter", so you can actually open a bug report (which I've done now).

Offline

#21 2018-01-11 20:24:51

jonathon
Member
From: UK
Registered: 2017-07-19
Posts: 32
Website

Re: bugtracker now online

Thank you. smile

I wonder if it's worth making people "reporter" by default... why would people sign up to the bug tracker if not to report a bug?

Offline

#22 2018-01-12 06:06:45

deep42thought
Administrator
From: Jena, Germany
Registered: 2017-06-17
Posts: 378

Re: bugtracker now online

to spam? At least, that's what bots do in the forums. But anyway, I haven't seen one bot on the bugtracker registering yet ...

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB