You are not logged in.
Hello,
after this update
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] transaction started
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] upgraded c-ares (1.14.0-1.1 -> 1.15.0-1.0)
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] upgraded file (5.34-1.6 -> 5.35-1.0)
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] upgraded iproute2 (4.18.0-1.5 -> 4.19.0-1.0)
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] upgraded linux (4.18.14.arch1-1.1 -> 4.18.16.arch1-1.0)
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] upgraded tlp (1.1-1.0 -> 1.1-1.1)
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] upgraded upower (0.99.8-2.0 -> 0.99.9-1.0)
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] upgraded zsh-completions (0.28.0-1.0 -> 0.29.0-1.0)
[2018-10-27 09:59] [ALPM] transaction completedmy package management helper pacui https://github.com/excalibur1234/pacui stopped working. When it is supposed to show a list of packages to install or to remove it just hangs.
I built fzf-git 20171027-1, installed it removing fzf 0.17.5-1.0 and then pacui started to work again.
Any package which relies on fuzzy search like fzf might have similar issues, so anybody with similar issues can try my workaround.
Last edited by eugen-b (2018-10-27 09:58:16)
Offline
I think fzf needs a rebuild again.
Because when I replace my fzf-git with fzf from the repo I get this slowness in pacui. I could test with any other program that uses fzf if you can suggest me one.
I would really appreciate a rebuild, because if pacui won't work after a rebuild then there must be another error which I'd like to help to find.
Offline
Hi, I pushed fzf 0.18.0-2.0 to stable. Hope that one works...
Offline
Thanks, Andreas! But it was 0.18.0-2.0 which was giving me the issue. I'm using the testing arch32 repo.
I've just installed 0.18.0-2.1 and the issue persists. FYI, here is the output: https://hastebin.com/etijakejes.coffeescript
I will contact the developer of pacui, thanks for the testing opportunity on his behalf from me!
Offline
"runtime: out of memory:" looks like "modern" development to me: now faster because we load everything
into a 64 GB memory cache... :-)
fzf 0.18.0-2.0 would have hit stable anyway soon, as in Archlinux no package depends on it.
Offline
(I opened a topic at manjaro32.)
I suspect there is something different in the build process between fzf and fzf-git. It's unlikely some feature of the newer git version, because the difference was already there a year ago.
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/comm … ckages/fzf
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/ … ?h=fzf-git
Offline
@andreas_baumann, @deep42thought! Can you have a look at the topic on Manjaro forum!
If you find time, please, take a closer look at the difference in PKGBUILD between fzf and fzf-git. There are differences, but it is difficult to say which are significant that fzf causes an error and fzf-git not. Maybe for the purpose of a test you can build fzf-git on the build server to see if it doesn't cause the error.
Last edited by eugen-b (2019-09-21 19:29:15)
Offline