You are not logged in.

#1 2024-02-19 20:19:12

Eirikr1848
Member
Registered: 2022-04-09
Posts: 23

Any benefit to rebuilding the kernel with -O3 and LTO?

Cachyos does it, along with adding a few schedulers: what would need to be done here to demonstrate performance improvements/impacts to see if worth the time?

Offline

#2 2024-02-19 20:56:25

abaumann
Administrator
From: Zurich
Registered: 2019-11-14
Posts: 991
Website

Re: Any benefit to rebuilding the kernel with -O3 and LTO?

I don't think O2 uand O3 is such a big difference. LTO likely results in out of memory situations when building in 32-bit VMs.
Currenltly the linux package is not rebuilding anyway because of Python most liklely.

I see most benefit results from targeting the right architecure in the Linux kernel configuration.

Aha, CachyOS raised the minimal ISA to x86-64-v3, that's something which has been discussed in upstream Arch for some time.
I doubt, this gives more than 10%.

For 32-bit I'm actually really happy if something boots and doesn't constantly break, to be frank. :-)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB